Apple files lawsuit against OpenAI alleging trade secret theft by former Apple staff

Apple has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California accusing OpenAI of stealing its trade secrets. The complaint targets OpenAI and two former Apple executives—Tang Tan, a former VP of product design, and Chang Liu, a senior systems electrical engineer—who allegedly took confidential hardware designs and project data. Apple says the alleged theft spans code names, prototype specifications, and even physical Apple components brought to OpenAI interview sessions. The dispute arrives as OpenAI pushes into consumer hardware, a move that could directly challenge Apple’s core products. The case could reshape how AI firms recruit talent from hardware giants and how trade‑secret protections are enforced.

What happened

Apple filed the suit on July 10, naming OpenAI, its hardware chief Tang Tan, and former Apple engineer Chang Liu as defendants. The filing claims Tan directed interview candidates still at Apple to bring actual Apple parts for “show‑and‑tell” sessions and coached departing employees on evading Apple’s security procedures. Liu is accused of taking an Apple‑issued laptop after leaving in January 2026 and using it to download technical specifications, engineering presentations, and other proprietary project data. The complaint adds that Apple first raised its concerns with OpenAI in February, requesting an investigation that never received a response. Apple characterizes the conduct as “the tip of the iceberg,” suggesting a broader pattern of illicit information gathering. OpenAI’s hardware ambitions intensified after it acquired Jony Ive’s startup io Products for roughly $6.5 billion last year, bringing over 50 engineers into its ranks. The acquisition is cited as part of OpenAI’s strategy to develop its own consumer hardware, potentially competing directly with Apple’s iPhone and Apple Watch lines.

Why it matters

If the court finds OpenAI liable, the ruling could set a precedent for how AI companies handle talent transitions from hardware firms, tightening hiring protocols and increasing due‑diligence obligations. A successful suit would also protect Apple’s competitive edge in upcoming product categories, preserving the secrecy that underpins its market advantage. Conversely, a dismissal could embolden AI firms to accelerate hardware development using insights gleaned from former employees, reshaping the competitive landscape between AI labs and traditional consumer‑tech giants.

How to think about it

Developers and builders should audit their onboarding and offboarding processes to ensure no confidential assets leave the organization. When recruiting talent from competitors, implement clear policies that prohibit the transfer of proprietary code names, schematics, or physical components. Keep legal counsel involved early to assess any red‑flag signals, and consider contractual safeguards such as non‑disclosure and non‑compete clauses that are enforceable in your jurisdiction. Finally, monitor the litigation’s progress, as any court‑issued injunctions could impact ongoing collaborations or supply‑chain arrangements.

FAQ